ISSN 1566-6379

First published
in 2003


   

Paper 4 - Abstract

Home Papers in this Issue Previous Issues Site Map

    .

Home
About the Journal
Scope
Editorial Board
Submission Guidelines
Call for Papers

 

For information on the European Conference on IT Evaluation, click here

Downloadable documents on this site require Adobe Acrobat Reader (free download here)

Seven Ways to get Your Favoured IT Project Accepted – Politics in IT Evaluation, (pp 31-40)
Egon Berghout1, Menno Nijland2 and Kevin Grant3

1
Centre of IT Economics Research (CITER), University of Groningen, The Netherlands
2
M&I/Partners, Amersfoort, The Netherlands
3Glasgow Caledonian University, Caledonian Business School, Scotland,
e.w.berghout@eco.rug.nl
Nijland@mxi.nl
kevin.grant@gcal.ac.uk
 


   

Abstract:

IS managers are being put under increasing pressure to justify the value of corporate IT/IS expenditure. Their constant quest for the ‘holy grail’ continues, as existing methods and approaches of justifying IT/IS expenditure are still failing to deliver. The decision making process is not as objective and transparent as it is claimed or intended to be. This paper discusses seven commonly used tactics used by business managers to influence IT appraisals. The paper takes a ‘devil’s advocate’ position and adopts some irony when looking at the area of power and politics in IT evaluation. Rather than promoting the use of these techniques, this article aims to raise awareness that IT evaluation is not as rational as most IT evaluation researchers/practitioners would want it to be or indeed claim it to be. It is argued that rationalisation or counter tactics may counteract influence techniques in an attempt to get behind the cloak and dagger side of organisational power and politics, but politics and power in decision-making cannot and should not be filtered out. Due to dissimilarities of objectives, limitations of time and information, influence techniques will always be used. However, rather than being counterproductive, these techniques are essential in the process of decision making of IT projects. They help organisations reach better decisions, which receive more commitment than decisions that were forced to comply with strictly rational approaches. Awareness of the influence and manipulation techniques used in practice will help to deal with power and politics in IT evaluation and thereby come to better IT investment decisions.

Keywords: IT Evaluation, IT Decision Making, IT Assessment, Information Economics, Decision Making, Organisational Power & Politics. Information Management.

Home Up Papers in this Issue Previous Issues Site Map

EJISE is published by Academic Conferences Limited
Curtis Farm, Kidmore End, Nr Reading RG4 9AY, England
Tel: +44 (0)1189 724148, Fax: +44 (0)1189 724691, Email: info@ejise.com

Send mail to info@academic-conferences.com with questions or comments about this web site.
Copyright © 2002-2006 Electronic Journal of Information Systems Evaluation
Last modified: September 29, 2005
ISSN 1566-6379